Wednesday, July 29, 2009

RWJF Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the IOM Enters the World of Social Media

Foundation Launches Future of Nursing Blog

The blog will offer commentary from various health policy experts and nursing leaders on thought-provoking topics such as:
  • Nurses and physicians working as partners in providing primary care
  • Challenges and issues facing the nursing profession
  • Innovative solutions to address the nursing and nurse faculty shortage
The Initiative Twitter page will provide quick access to key nursing and health reform-related news, as well as links to new information posted on the Initiative Web site.

We encourage you to visit the Initiative blog regularly and to follow us on Twitter to stay current on these key issues of national concern.

Check out Donna Shalala’s blog post about the Initiative launch.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Transitional Care Cuts Hospital Re-Entry Rates, Costs


The NPR story featuring Mary Naylor's Transitional Care Model is now available online at NPR.org:

Here's a number that tells you a lot about what's wrong with the American health care system: When older patients get discharged from a hospital, 1 out of 5 of them will come right back within a month. Medicare pays $17 billion a year on these hospital readmissions. And in many cases, coming back should have been avoidable.

Mary Naylor is trying to change that. She started the Transitional Care Model at the University of Pennsylvania Health Care System in Philadelphia. A nurse with advanced training in geriatrics is assigned to an elderly patient while he is in the hospital and then follows the patient, with frequent visits and contact, over two or three months to help him manage his own care.

"Every time an older adult is hospitalized, it generally results in changes in their plan of care," says Naylor. Some of the instructions from a doctor can be hard to follow, like new prescriptions. "So they would go home and 24 hours after discharge have a set of prescriptions, drugs already in their cabinet and wonder, 'Should I be taking these plus these?'"


For the rest of the story and to hear the clip from Morning Edition, click here.


***

The INQRI program is very invested in ensuring good patient care quality at each stage of the health care journey. An INQRI team at Marquette University has been working for the past two years on discharge preparation.

Hospital readmission and emergency department utilization within the first 30 days following hospital discharge represent adverse, potentially avoidable, and costly outcomes of hospitalization. For their project, "A Quality and Cost Analysis of Nurse Practice Predictors of Readiness for Hospital Discharge and Post-Discharge Outcomes," Marianne Weiss and Olga Yakusheva, worked on linking the unit-level nurse practice environment and nursing care processes with patient outcomes at discharge and post-hospitalization. Specifically, the study examined direct and indirect causal relationships between the nursing practice environment, the discharge teaching process and readiness for hospital discharge with hospital readmission and emergency department utilization.

Dr. Weiss has published extensively regarding discharge readiness. To read her article, "Patients' Perceptions of Hospital Discharge Informational Content," co-authored by Lynn Maloney, click here.

INQRI Program Director Mary Naylor on NPR

INQRI Program Director Mary Naylor’s Transitional Care Model is scheduled to be featured today on NPR’s Morning Edition.

Click here to find your local NPR affiliate. The piece will be available online, via live and archived streams from NPR, to your desktop.


The Transitional Care Model (TCM) provides comprehensive in-hospital planning and home follow-up for chronically ill high-risk older adults hospitalized for common medical and surgical conditions.

For the millions of Americans who suffer from multiple chronic conditions and complex therapeutic regimens, TCM emphasizes coordination and continuity of care, prevention and avoidance of complications, and close clinical treatment and management - all accomplished with the active engagement of patients and their family and informal caregivers and in collaboration with the patient's physicians.

For more information on the Transitional Care Model, please click here.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Updates on RWJF's Initiative on the Future of Nursing at IOM


Please visit www.iom.edu/nursing and http://www.thefutureofnursing.org/ to learn about ways to become involved in the Initiative on the Future of Nursing. To receive updates, meeting information, and other announcements concerning the IFN, please register for the listserv here, or email nursing@nas.edu with any specific questions or comments.

Upcoming events are listed below. Participation options are still being developed and we will post more information when it is available.
  • September 14-15: Washington, DC - Committee meeting and technical workshop
  • October 19: Los Angeles, CA - Site Visit, Forum on the Future of Nursing, RWJF Scholar/Fellow Educational Seminar: Acute Care
  • November 2-3: Washington, DC - Committee meeting and technical workshop
  • December 3: Philadelphia, PA - Site Visit, Forum on the Future of Nursing, RWJF Scholar/Fellow Educational Seminar: Community Health/ Primary Care/Public Health
  • February 22: Houston, TX - Site Visit, Forum on the Future of Nursing, RWJF Scholar/Fellow Educational Seminar: Education
Click here to download the agenda from the IFN meeting from July 14, 2009.

How do medical errors happen? And what can be done?



Millions of people suffer every year from mistakes in health care. In a presentation from the IHI Open School, Lucian Leape explains why those mistakes happen — and how to prevent them.

The INQRI program is committed to understanding and preventing medication errors. Several of our teams are focused on this important work:

  • "Examining the Impact of Nursing Structures and Processes on Medication Errors"
    The Institute of Medicine noted that a hospital patient on average is subject to at least one medication error per day, making medication errors the most common cause of preventable adverse events. This interdisciplinary study, directed by Linda Flynn and Dong Suh from Rutgers University has been designed to disentangle the effects of nursing structures and care processes on non-intercepted medication errors in acute care hospitals. Click here to read a profile on Linda and her work.

  • "Nursing-Pharmacy Collaboration on Medication Reconciliation: A Novel Approach to Information Management"
    Deficits in communication across the continuum of care in regards to medication use can place patients at serious risk for harm. This interdisciplinary team, directed by Linda Costa and Bob Feroli at Johns Hopkins Hospital is examining how to economically support direct care providers in medication reconciliation in order to facilitate safe transition to and from hospital and community. The team has evaluated the effectiveness of a nurse-pharmacist clinical information coordination team in improving drug information management on admission and discharge, quantify potential harm due to reconciliation failures, and determine cost-benefit related to averted harm. Click here to read “Nurse-Led Interdisciplinary Teams: Challenges and Rewards,” a piece co-authored by Linda and Stephanie Poe which ran last fall in the Journal of Nursing Care Quality’s Focus on Patient Safety column.

  • "Empowering Home Care Nurses to Efficiently Resolve Medication Discrepancies"
    To contribute to a better understanding of the potential for home care nurses to lead in the identification and resolution of medication discrepancies during transitions between hospital and home care providers, this team at Washingon State University is conducting a clinical trial that investigates a new nurse-led, informatics-based intervention. They hypothesize that with this improvement in their environment, home care nurses already on staff can enhance patients' outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and eliminate the need for duplicative services by external consultants or specialty providers. This team is co-led by Cynthia Corbett and Stephen Setter. Click here to read more about their project.

Recently, Drs. Flynn and Costa presented their work at the Funders Forum, co-sponsored by INQRI and the Donaghue Foundation. Click here to download their presentations.

For other programs from the IHI Open School, click here.

When Health Reform Passes, Then What?

Experts Recommend 20 Solutions to Guide Health Care Reform from Policy to Action

With Congress focused on the substance of health reform rather than the details of its implementation, a new report provides recommendations to lawmakers and the Obama administration about how to translate complicated new policies into reality in a timely fashion. In particular, the report calls for the president to designate an agency and a person to direct the implementation of health reform. The report also calls for lawmakers to include in legislation a carefully constructed schedule for phasing in reforms.

The report’s recommendations were developed by a panel of experts from the National Academy of Social Insurance and the National Academy of Public Administration, with the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. While the panel of experts who authored the report presume a goal of expanding access to affordable, high-quality health care, with the ultimate aim of universal health coverage, the panel does not endorse any particular plan for achieving that objective. The report concentrates on seven administrative functions essential to several health care reform proposals: planning and coordinating implementation, subsidizing health insurance premiums and cost sharing, administering health insurance mandates, regulating health insurance, restructuring health insurance markets, designing administrative organizations, and simplifying administration and controlling costs. In each area, the report defines the choices, summarizes what is known about them, and draws conclusions.

Read the policy report.
Read a blog post from Paul Van de Water.
View the Webcast.


(c) Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Patient Safety Day - July 25, 2009

Remembering patients and families who have lost their life (or quality of life) due to medical errors and harm - and in tribute to those who work to improve the safety and quality of healthcare for future patients.


"Together, lighting the path to safe healthcare - today and everyday:
safe, high quality healthcare is neither accidental nor static."


Time: Moment of Silence at Noon and 6 p.m. your timezone


The 2009 Inaugural Florence Nightingale and Dr. E. Codman Patient Safety Day Award recipient is Dr. Lucian Leape. For more information about Dr. Leape, please click here.


Other resources on Patient Safety:

Friday, July 24, 2009

Doctor And Nursing Shortage Could Undermine Health Care Reform

Yesterday, Kaiser Health News published a report based on two articles, which discusses how the nurse and physician shortage could impact health care reform. Reuters has reported that analysis of the current and projected shortages could have a negative impact should President Obama succeed in his efforts to reform health care. If most of the 46 million currently uninsured Americans enter the health care system, experts fear that there are not enough resources to accommodate them. To address similar concerns, Texas Health Resources Inc., the largest hospital system in North Texas, has formed a temp agency in an attempt to save money and correct its nursing shortage, as reported by the Dallas Morning News.

INQRI teams are on the front line, examining this important issue. Several of our grantees have focused on the impact of nurse staffing, including the use of supplemental nurses, on the quality of patient care, including:

  • Ying Xue and Deborah Freund have conducted a project to understand the use of supplemental registered nurses (SRNs) hired from agencies to compensate for hospitals' nurse shortages. The project, "Quality and Cost Outcomes of Hospital Supplemental Nurse Staffing," examines the impact of SRNs on the quality of care and cost.

  • In their study, "Nursing Care Quality in Acute Care Hospitals: New Linkages to Patient Outcomes," Arlyss Anderson Rothman and Adams Dudley have examined whether increases in nurse staffing and skill mix improve hospital performance and improve overall nursing performance as measured by composite indicators that capture patients' perceptions of care and other selected outcomes of care such as complication rates.

  • In their project, "Quality Care on Acute Inpatient Units," Mary Blegen and Tom Vaughn have examined the power of the National Quality Forum-endorsed measures to advance quality nursing research and design, test other measures as potential indicators of nursing quality, and determine the impact of nurse staffing on these indicators in specific types of patient care units.

U.S. News and World Report... focusing on quality

U.S. News and World Report recently released two articles relating to health care quality:


America's Best Hospitals

  • Last week, U.S. News released its 20th "America's Best Hospitals" report and for the 19th consecutive year, Johns Hopkins Hospital has been rated in first place.
Hospitals of the Future

  • U.S. News reports that "hospitals of the future" are expected to use health information technology (IT) and innovative design elements to improve care quality, reduce the risk of medical errors and create a more healing atmosphere.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Children's View on Quality Should be Considered

Early in his term President Barack Obama signed into law the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). CHIPRA promised a “new day for children’s health care quality” and launched a new coordinated effort from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement its quality provisions.

Today, AHRQ’s National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and CMS’s Quality Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children’s Healthcare in Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Programs (CHIP) are holding a two-day meeting (July 22-23) on healthcare quality and research on issues related to pediatric care. This inaugural meeting is an exciting step forward in the implementation of CHIPRA and pediatric quality measures, an issue that two INQRI grantees have researched extensively.

Nearly half of the 7.6 million children hospitalized every year in the United States are over age 6, yet no one ever systematically asks these children about their hospital experiences or the quality of care they have received. Instead they turn to their parents to answer for them.

Columbus Children’s Hospital researchers Nancy Ryan-Wenger and William Gardner say too often children are the “silent consumers of care.” Their INQRI research of hospitalized children has shown that seeking answers from parents is not an accurate measure of children’s perceptions of their care. In fact, children prioritize an entirely different set of factors when rating their hospital experience. The graph below shows that while only about 10% of parents view “check on me often” as an important factor in the care of their children, children see this as a very important measure of their care. And, the list goes on from there.

Through their research, Ryan-Wenger and Gardner are hoping to improve the reliability of tools to measure children’s health care, an effort that has great implications for changing nursing practice and improving care. Why are children’s perceptions important? Early experiences with medical care can greatly impact future decision-making about seeking care. It can even influence future career decisions in a time when bringing new nurses and doctors into the system is essential and becoming increasingly important to the success of American healthcare.

Ryan-Wenger and Gardner recommend both adding a “quality of care from the hospitalized children’s perspective” component to existing nursing sensitive indicators and working to develop and implement a standard, reliable measure of a “children’s hospital experience scale.” They provide a sample concept, reproduced below.


As AHRQ and CMS meet with stakeholder groups this week on pediatric healthcare quality measures, they must acknowledge the difference between parents’ and children’s views of care and take that into account. There are ubiquitous surveys seeking patient views on hospital care but there are no surveys that ask children to answer directly. Ryan-Wenger and Gardner say this has to change because children’s opinions matter.

For more on Ryan-Wenger and Gardner’s study, please click here.

From RWJF: Exploring Health Care Quality Transparency Initiatives

Commentary and Issue Brief Highlight Keys to Success in Quality Transparency Programs

In recent years, significant energy has been spent to develop health care quality information resources that help consumers make informed decisions about their care, including the development of products such as hospital and physician report cards. Yet despite clear evidence that quality can vary significantly between providers, most Americans still rely on information from friends, family and physicians when choosing them.

Two new publications from the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) and funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation explore the potential for health care quality transparency initiatives and the impact of those already underway.

In the commentary “Health Care Quality Transparency: If You Build It, Will Patients Come?” HSC President Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D., and Nicole M. Kemper, M.P.H., an HSC health research analyst, conclude that until consumers become more aware and concerned about differences in hospital and physician quality, the main purpose of quality reporting will be to motivate providers to improve their performance.

In a separate issue brief, "Designing Effective Health Care Quality Transparency Initiatives," HSC Senior Researcher Ha T. Tu, M.P.A., and HSC Health Research Analyst Johanna R. Lauer highlight two quality “report card” transparency initiatives for hospitals and primary care physicians that can be considered success stories in both design and implementation. The authors identify common features of both programs that other programs may be able to draw from and replicate.

(c) Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Monday, July 20, 2009

Neonatal ICU is Not the Place to Find Labor Savings


Today, Modern Healthcare posted a commentary by INQRI grantees Eileen Lake and Thelma Patrick on their research on neonatal intensive care units (NICU). They argue that by fully staffing a NICU with sufficiently-seasoned nurses and by developing an environment in which nurses work as a team with doctors, hospitals can reduce the number of hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in these tiny babies.

See below for an excerpt from the article.

What's a NICU with inadequate support for nurses? We define it as a unit that comes up short when itcomes to staffing and other resources. Nurses on such units are often caring for too many critically ill infants. In addition, they're often pulled away from direct nursing care and are juggling too many non-nursing duties, like answering the phone, running to pick up a prescription or transporting a patient. A suboptimal unit is also one where nurses' authority doesn't match their responsibility. When they speak up with an urgent concern about a tiny baby, they may not get a rapid response or credit for their assessment. In some cases, nurses delay calling doctors because they're concerned about getting an angry response: Over time, such strained relationships can lead to inefficient or suboptimal care. NICU babies, especially the very tiny ones, often need constant nursing care just to prevent complications like infections or bleeding in the brain. But hospital managers struggling to stay afloat in a deepening recession might be tempted to cut nursing staff or other services…

…So what should hospitals do? CEOs should fully staff the NICU and other hospital service units so that nurses aren't called away from a critically ill infant to answer the phone. Fully staffing a NICU might mean hiring more registered nurses to make sure that critically ill infants have one-on-one nursing care. Or managers might have to keep support staff, like secretaries, on duty—even at night or on the weekend. Hospitals should also make sure that they don't leave lots of relatively young nurses on duty without support, including a seasoned supervisor. Without adequate supervision, a short-staffed young nurse might turn too quickly from one very sick newborn to another—and fail to wash up. That one misstep could spread a lethal bug from one baby to the next. Managers must also work to create a professional atmosphere in the NICU so that nurses and doctors work together as a team. They must include nurses in hospital rounds and encourage nurses to speak up when they have concerns about a patient.

For full text, see here.

Watch Leapfrog Group's CEO, Leah Binder, on Quality and Transparency

Click here to watch Leah Binder's interview with Modern Healthcare on quality and transparency. In this interview with Modern Healthcare reporter Jean DerGurahian, Leah reflects on her first year as the CEO at the Leapfrog Group and talks about how Leapfrog's quality measures are different from others.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

INQRI Meeting: A Recap

We spent an incredibly busy couple of days together in Princeton! INQRI's Fourth Annual Meeting featured tips for using social media, a keynote address entitled "Disruption" by Bob Brook, stirring remarks from RWJF president, Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, project overviews from our new finalists, 2 panels from our Cohort 3 teams, an update on the National Quality Forum's nurse-sensitive measures, an introduction of the Intiative on the Future of Nursing, and of course: the presentation of research findings!

Our 12 Cohort 2 teams are in the final stages of their work and shared their outcomes with us.

“Linking Processes of Nursing Care and Patient Safety Outcomes: An Analysis of the Cause and Effect of Safe Practice”
John Welton and Richard Lindrooth

“Nursing-Pharmacy Collaboration on Medication Reconciliation: A Novel Approach to Information Management”

Linda Costa and Bob Feroli

“Quality and Cost Outcomes of Hospital Supplemental Nurse Staffing”
Ying Xue

“Examining the Impact of Nursing Structures and Processes on Medication Errors”
Linda Flynn and Dong Suh

“Nursing Care Quality in Acute Care Hospitals: New Linkages to Patient Outcomes”
Arlyss Anderson Rothman and Adams Dudley

“Nursing Workforce Impact on Performance Improvement in the CMS/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project [HQID]”
Presented for the team by Doug Wholey

“Acuity-adjusted Staffing, Nurse Practice Environments and NICU Outcomes”
Eileen Lake and Jeannette Rogowski

“Quality of Pediatric Nursing Care from the Children's Perspective”
Nancy Ryan-Wenger and Bill Gardner

“Rural Hospital Quality Collaborative on Evidence-Based Nursing”
Robin Newhouse and Laura Morlock

“Translating Fall Risk Status into Interventions to Prevent Patient Falls”
Patti Dykes and Stuart Lipsitz

“Impact of System-Centered Factors, and Processes of Nursing Care on Fall Prevalence and Injuries from Falls”
Marita Titler and Leah Shever

“A Quality and Cost Analysis of Nurse Practice Predictors of Readiness for Hospital Discharge and Post-Discharge Outcomes”
Marianne Weiss and Olga Yakusheva


For information on these projects, please visit our website.

Live from the INQRI Meeting

Special thanks to Sue Hassmiller and Linda Burnes Bolton for updating INQRI grantees, National Advisory Committee members and distinguished guests on RWJF's Initiative on the Future of Nursing at the IOM. Sue and Linda provided a wonderful overview of the initiative and answered questions from our researchers during lunch. Thank you, Sue and Linda - we look forward to hearing more!


Susan Hassmiller
Senior Advisor for Nursing
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing at the Institute of Medicine





Linda Burnes Bolton
Vice Chair
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing at the Institute of Medicine




For more information on the initiative, please check out the website.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

RWJF and the Institute of Medicine Join Forces to Launch Unprecedented Initiative on the Future of Nursing in America

Committee Led by Donna Shalala and Linda Burnes Bolton to Develop Blueprint for Expanded Access to Quality Care through Better Use of Nurses

As our nation looks to make fundamental reforms to health care, a unique opportunity exists to provide information, insight and guidance on the future role of nursing in the delivery of that care. As our nation’s health care is transformed, the nursing profession will also need to be reconceptualized.

As part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine (IOM), the IOM has convened a committee of experts to identify the potential for increasing access, improving quality and reducing costs through the involvement of nursing leaders and widespread use of nursing care solutions. The committee’s recommendations will address a range of system changes and will help identify vital roles for nurses in the design and implementation of a more effective and efficient health care system.

The study committee will review innovative models of nursing care and education with a goal of creating a transformational report on the future of nursing that includes solutions that nursing can provide to improve the quality of patient care while controlling costs.

Read the press release.
Read the RWJF/IOM Statement of Task.
Read the Committee Member bios.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Another Way to Follow the INQRI Annual Meeting from Your Desktop


In addition to tweeting with us, you can also watch the meeting live from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation from your desktop!

For the day long meetings on Wednesday and Thursday, you can view the event in progress via this link. Use password inqrisra so you don’t miss any of the action! The meeting will kick off at 9.30a Wed morning and end around 5.15p. We’ll start up again Thursday morning at 9.30a and conclude around 4p.

Check it out!

Monday, July 13, 2009

Tweet with Us!




Follow us on Twitter!


The INQRI Annual Meeting kicks off tomorrow night in Princeton, NJ. We will be tweeting throughout the program. The hashtag for the event will be #INQRI09. To find the discussion, enter #INQRI09 in the search box in Twitter. To contribute to the conversation, include #INQRI09 in all tweets.

Northwest Indiana Hospitals Form Patient Safety Coalition

Hospitals in Lake and Porter counties in Indiana have formed a coalition designed to improve patient safety and care quality, the Northwest Times reports. Modeled after similar programs in the Indianapolis, Fort Wayne and Michiana areas, the new Northwest Indiana Patient Safety Coalition includes Community Healthcare System, The Methodist Hospitals, Porter Health and the Sisters of St. Francis Health Services. Under the coalition, participating hospitals must designate a team of safety leaders that includes the chief nursing executive, chief medical officer and leaders of patient safety and quality committees, who will be required to attend monthly meetings. At these meetings, the teams will identify and prioritize safety practices to be used across the board in all hospitals. Already, the teams have identified a series of priorities, including standardizing surgical instruments and sponge-count policies, policies to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired infections, a patient education campaign focused on medication lists, efforts to standardize emergency codes, and establishing guidelines for care while patients are in emergency rooms waiting for a permanent bed assignment. Noting that "patient safety has to happen on the front lines of care," the director of the Indiana Patient Safety Center notes that the coalition will serve as an opportunity for participating hospitals to "have a dialog and improve the possibility of improving care in the communities." (Franklin, Northwest Times, 7/6/09)


Copyright 2009 The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation http://www.rwjf.org The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, based in Princeton, N.J., is the nation's largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Report Suggests New York Hospitals Have More to Do to Reduce HAIs

A report from the New York State Health Department finds that hospitals are making strides in reducing the risk of some hospital acquired infections (HAIs), but rates remain higher than the national average for some types of infections, the Jamestown Post-Journal reports. The second annual Hospital-Acquired Infections, New York State 2008 report is based on 2008 data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network system for HAI reporting on 186 hospitals that performed colon, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and hip replacement procedures, as well as the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infections in adult, pediatric and neonatal intensive care units (ICUs). Overall, HAIs were highest for colon surgery at 5.0 percent, followed by CABG at 2.2 percent for chest infections and 1.1 percent for donor site infections, and 1.2 percent for hip replacement surgery. Still, both colon surgical-site infection rates and CABG infection rates decreased from a year ago and were significantly lower than 2006–2007 national rates, and rates for hip replacement surgery, which were included in the report for the first time in 2008, were not statistically different from the national average. However, central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in ICUs were significantly higher than 2006–2007 national rates in five of the nine types of ICU settings evaluated, with a high of 3.5 infections per 1,000 central-line days in pediatric ICUs. According to the state health commissioner, the report did not identify a single hospital with high hospital-acquired infection rates across the board, a finding that the credits to the health department's efforts to "work with hospitals reporting the highest infection rates to identify opportunities for prevention." To ensure continued progress toward reducing HAIs, the report notes that the health department will continue to identify risk factors, prevention strategies and interventions to enhance patient safety; will consult with infection preventionists, hospital epidemiologists, physicians and others to identify evidence-based infection prevention strategies; and continue to require, refine and report HAI data to inform consumer choice. Reflecting on the report, State Sen. Tom Duane (D), chair of the Senate Health Committee, noted that "reducing hospital-acquired infections is an important public health goal that improves patient care and reduces hospital costs," adding that "New York State's reporting system provides a cutting-edge tool for identifying best practices and improving performance across all of New York's hospitals." (Johnson, Jamestown Post-Journal, 7/5/09; Drury, Business First of Buffalo, 7/6/09; New York State Health Department release, 6/30/09; New York State Health Department report, 6/30/09)


Copyright 2009 The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation http://www.rwjf.org The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, based in Princeton, N.J., is the nation's largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Health Reformers Begin to Find Middle-Ground?

New report suggests consensus is forming around key issues in the health reform debate


With various versions of health care reform legislation being passed around Capitol Hill, and outspoken advocates pressing agendas on all sides, most recent news reports have highlighted the most contentious issues. But a new report suggests that health reform discussions so far have yielded more agreement than may at first meet the eye. Funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and authored by experts from Avalere Health, the report identifies and explores eight areas in which diverse business, medical and consumer interests are beginning to find middle ground and earn the support of bipartisan lawmakers.

Although there is still much to be debated and decided, the authors say there is movement among the parties across several key elements of reform, including:

  1. the nature of private insurance market reforms;
  2. the need for, and the structure of, a health insurance exchange;
  3. whether and how a government-sponsored “public plan” should be created;
  4. how best to leverage Medicaid and/or public programs to expand access;
  5. whether an individual mandate is needed;
  6. the scope and authority of government involvement in comparative effectiveness research;
  7. sequencing and scope of payment reform; and
  8. whether to limit the tax exclusion on employer-based coverage as a reform financing mechanism.

The report provides a side-by-side explanation of the different perspectives for each issue and then identifies “the middle ground” around which consensus may be forming.


Read the policy report.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

State Reports Reveal Wide Variation in Health Care Quality

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has released its annual set of reports detailing state-by-state health care quality, finding that there are "mixed reviews" for the quality of care being provided, with no states performing exceptionally well or very poorly on all quality measures, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports. Created from state-level data that was originally used to draft the 2008 National Healthcare Quality Report released by HHS in May, these state snapshots draw from more than 30 sources, including government surveys, health care facilities and health care organizations. The reports summarize care quality in three dimensions: type of care, care setting and clinical area, such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease, maternal and child health and respiratory disease. The snapshots allow users to compare the care quality provided in states in the same region as well as compare state performance against the national average. For the first time, the 2008 reports include a section examining asthma rates—including data on potentially preventable hospitalizations—as well as an expanded focus on care disparities that includes new information on diabetes prevalence. Noting that there remains much room for improvement, the Wall Street Journal's Health Blog reports that Wisconsin, Minnesota and Massachusetts scored highest in the nation for all measures in overall health care. For Massachusetts, specifically, the strongest measures included the proportion of hospital patients with heart attacks who received a beta blocker within 24 hours of admission and the percentage of women older than age 40 who receive mammograms, among other measures. However, Massachusetts' weakest measure was for selected infections because of medical care per 1,000 medical and surgical discharges, with the state performing below the national average. Meanwhile, HHS also recently released its own series of state-specific reports on the health care status quo, which highlighted "the urgent need for health reform across the nation." The reports include information on care cost and quality and show that, while the cost of health care is rising, the quality of care is decreasing. Specifically, the reports examine metrics such as the percent increase in family premiums since 2000; the "hidden tax" that insured individuals and families pay to subsidize care for the uninsured; the overall quality ratings for health care in each state; and the impact of failing to adequately invest in preventive health measures. Noting that the reports provide a "clear demonstration that there are problems with health care in every state," HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius added that "we cannot wait to pass reform that protects what works about health care and fixes what's broken." (Twedt, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 6/27/09; Wall Street Journal Health Blog, 6/26/09; HHS release, 6/26/09; AHRQ release, 6/26/09; AHRQ Web site).


Copyright 2009 The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation http://www.rwjf.org The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, based in Princeton, N.J., is the nation's largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care.